|
works
bibliography
plays
fiction
screenplays
articles
interviews
video
biography
about
bookstore
in
Polish
|
 |
 |
Articles
Warsaw Scenes | Hamlet
| Gombrowicz | Polish
Odyssey
Playwright is Free | Stage
View | A Tale of Two Moscows
New York Times - November 2, 1988
“Hamlet,”
a Mirror Of the Times
William Shakespeare's “Hamlet,” in accord with how
directors and artists sensed their time, has been played in dozens of
ways: a criminal melodrama, a drama of metaphysics, a lesson in Viennese
psychoanalysis or an internal passion play.
At the end of the 20th century, “Hamlet” once again looks
beyond the man to the state of the nation, and seethes with the
politics. As recently directed by Ingmar Bergman, “Hamlet”
is less about a young man's inner struggles than about a nation's
collapse, about what he feels lies behind the prosperity in the West,
about the political and moral circumstances that drive a man mad. That
“something is rotten in the state of Denmark” has seldom
been shown with such force.
But the meaning of this capacious play also depends on the audience that
sees it. “Hamlet” staged in the Mark Taper Forum in Los
Angeles means something quite different from “Hamlet” staged
in the Taganka Theatre in Moscow. It has a different meaning in Kansas
City and a different one in Armenia. In 1980, just before the beginning
of Solidarity in Poland, I went to “Hamlet” in Warsaw. The
hero's observation in Act II that “Denmark is a prison”
provoked enthusiastic applause.
We don't know whether the Elizabeth I liked the first production of
“Hamlet,” but surely the Elsinore Court and the murderer on
the throne might not have appeared completely exotic. The times were
hard. She herself cut off more than 1,000 heads. The Queen must have
appreciated the fact that the promising young playwright showed
sufficient political maturity to set the action of the play in Denmark.
In more recent times, neither Hitler nor Stalin liked
“Hamlet” very much. Of course, both of them being serious
statesmen, they did not consider the possibility that someone might
identify them with the murderous King Claudius. Still, they were very
irritated by the play's overly intellectual protagonist, who talks too
much and does too little.
While Hermann Goring eventually permitted his favorite actor, Gustaf
Grundgens, to stage “Hamlet” in Berlin, it was a hero that
the Third Reich could be proud of: dynamic, a man of action and, most
important, a full-blooded Nordic.
In the 30's, the great Soviet theatre director Vsevolod Meyerhold had a
very interesting idea. He wanted to show the duality of Hamlet by
casting two actors in the role. One would symbolize action, the other
reflection. Meyerhold, in the end, did not stage “Hamlet” -
nevertheless in 1940 he was executed for “formalism.”
If Hamlet appeared on the political arena in this year's campaign, which
interpretation would be chosen by the spin doctors as most attractive to
American voters? The fact that Hamlet talks too much and does too little
would not, as we know, pose an obstacle. But he would be eliminated from
the race because of his extramarital affair with Ophelia.
In Ingmar Bergman's production, which was performed last June at the
Brooklyn Academy of Music, the Swedish actor Peter Stormare played
Hamlet in a black turtleneck, sun glasses and a black rubber coat. He
would not stand a chance in the Presidential debate: For too long he was
too close to power to preserve even a trace of innocence or illusion.
At the University of Wittenberg, he'd read the Manifesto of the Red
Brigades and learned to use a stiletto. This is a Hamlet who drags the
wounded Polonius roughly from behind the curtain and finishes him off
with expertise. He has been sleeping with Ophelia regularly and has
observed Fortinbras with interest. This episodic figure of the Norwegian
prince has for centuries been very important to “Hamlet.”
Moments after Hamlet's death, the Norwegian army enters Elsinore: On
Fortinbras depends the future of Denmark. In the shocking final moments
of Bergman's “Hamlet,” Fortinbras's army enters by
demolishing the back wall of the stage, carrying machine guns and boom
boxes that blast a deafening roar of hard rock. On their heads they are
wearing black helmets with protective plexiglass shields. They are a
cross between Middle East terrorists, New York crack dealers and South
American guerrillas. Expertly, they toss corpses into a common grave,
followed by the furniture.
Obeying Hamlet's dying request, Horatio tries to explain to Fortinbras
what has been going on in Denmark. Fortinbras orders Horatio shot.
Denmark is finished. There is nothing to talk about.
America has not had any experience of the loss of independence, foreign
armies or occupation. In most American stagings of “Hamlet,”
the character of Fortinbras never amounted to much. In many productions,
he was simply cut out from the play to reduce the budget.
The audience at the Brooklyn Academy of Music received the entry of
Fortinbras's army with carefree laughter. Not me. I belong to the
nervous generation. But I hope they are right in seeing this Hamlet's
ending as science fiction.
Copyright 1988 The New York Times Company
Warsaw Scenes | Hamlet
| Gombrowicz | Polish
Odyssey
Playwright is Free | Stage
View | A Tale of Two Moscows
|